On 24 March 2015 at 22:34, Jan Darowski <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > Here is my proposal for the GSoC. I believe it's the last thing from > the projects checklist so if you have any suggestions on how I could > improve it, please let me know. >
thanks for the submission, my quick 2c would be that the proposal should be expanded with more details about the implementation plans. the following needs confirmation from others, but i would say that the algorithm itself should be C and resting in the backend, while the UI implementation should be in C++ / Qt. i mean...it can clearly be done in C++ but it's a matter of consistency with the app backend which is C. also if the Subsurface backend becomes a C library eventually the VPM-B will be a part of that with less effort. lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
