On 18 March 2015 at 05:48, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thiago, > > would Subsurface benefit from using Qt Bluetooth for our intended Bluetooth > integration? > This would cause some interesting architectural challenges with > libdivecomputer (as that most definitely doesn’t want to depend on Qt), but I > find it very intriguing that Qt now supports all of the platforms we are > interested in… or am I missing something here? >
i can see that libDC has a parser API exposed, but i don't know if / how does that works, but if Subsurface uses Qt's BT it can in theory just use libDC as a parser (Thiago mentioned the same). i think it would be better for the student to first help Jeff get the BT working in libDC for Win32 and Linux and then start working on the Subsurface side. but...if the OSX code is not going to be donated soon (or maintained well in that aspect), i suggest we just use Qt's BT. there is also the option for libDC to expose API to allow the libDC user to specify the BT backend (e.g.. built-in VS external C-wrapped Qt BT), but that's probably a ton of extra work for Jeff. lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
