On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Rainer Mohr <m...@divelogs.de> wrote:
> > Am 28.01.15 um 18:33 schrieb Dirk Hohndel: > >> If I knew of a solution that works, I'd have implemented it a long time >> ago. >> >> I guess we could change our logic like this: >> >> - get rid of the "show unused cylinders" thing >> - on download from dive computer, only include those cylinders that are in >> use on the dive, based on whatever information we get from the dive >> computer >> - on all other methods of input, don't mess with the cylinders that are >> being given >> >> That means that for all existing dives downloaded from one of the >> "offending" dive computers you are out of luck and need to manually remove >> them if you don't want to see them. But for other scenarios we are doing >> something "somewhat intuitive and consistent". >> >> Thought? Counter suggestions? >> > > How about leave it as it is, but extend the decision by differing start- > and endpressures? > > So a tank is used if EITHER there is a gas switch in the data OR the start > and end pressures differ by say at least 5 bar. > All other tanks are unused (havent switched to them, havent breathed from > them). > I just sent such patch for divelogs.de upload earlier today. Waiting for Dirk to include it in the master.. miika
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
