So. I ran the UDDF output through the XSL schema from the uddf site. It looks like there are still lots of areas where we are not compliant.
- Lots of areas where there are mandatory tags we need to provide (looks like most of this is static). - Lots of ID which aren't compliant. I think this was problematic anyway, and we should be using generate-id() in almost all of these cases. For example, I have dives at 2 different sites, both called "Lighthouse". I really don't wan to start naming these "Lighthouse, Seychelles" and "Lighthouse, Mull" as then I'd have to do that for all of my dives. The ids with spaces in also don't seem to be acceptable, so it makes sense all round. I'm probably not going to be able to do much tonight (club night), but I might get some done when I get home. When were you looking to finalise the release? _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
