On 19.02.2014 00:17, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:05:01PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Here are 5 patches (version 2) for 3.10-stable. They are in response to:
>>
>>
>> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ltsi-dev/2014-February/003094.html
>
> You add a bunch of patches that are not stable kernel material at all.
> As-is, I can't take this, sorry. If all of these patches are required,
> how is this really a needed patch for 3.10?
>
> confused,
Sorry.
In fact all I want is 1 patch added to LTSI-3.10 as sent here:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ltsi-dev/2014-February/003092.html
You asked for it to go through 3.10-stable:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ltsi-dev/2014-February/003094.html
But it is dependent on patches that are in LTSI-3.10 (for Bay Trail) but not
3.10-stable.
Would it be OK to add just the 1 patch (in the first link above) to LTSI-3.10?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
