The patch titled
Subject: block: replace __getblk_slow misfix by grow_dev_page fix
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
block-replace-__getblk_slow-misfix-by-grow_dev_page-fix.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Subject: block: replace __getblk_slow misfix by grow_dev_page fix
Commit 91f68c89d8f3 ("block: fix infinite loop in __getblk_slow") is not
good: a successful call to grow_buffers() cannot guarantee that the page
won't be reclaimed before the immediate next call to __find_get_block(),
which is why there was always a loop there.
Yesterday I got "EXT4-fs error (device loop0): __ext4_get_inode_loc:3595:
inode #19278: block 664: comm cc1: unable to read itable block" on
console, which pointed to this commit.
I've been trying to bisect for weeks, why kbuild-on-ext4-on-loop-on-tmpfs
sometimes fails from a missing header file, under memory pressure on ppc
G5. I've never seen this on x86, and I've never seen it on 3.5-rc7
itself, despite that commit being in there: bisection pointed to an
irrelevant pinctrl merge, but hard to tell when failure takes between 18
minutes and 38 hours (but so far it's happened quicker on 3.6-rc2).
(I've since found such __ext4_get_inode_loc errors in /var/log/messages
from previous weeks: why the message never appeared on console until
yesterday morning is a mystery for another day.)
Revert 91f68c89d8f3, restoring __getblk_slow() to how it was (plus a
checkpatch nitfix). Simplify the interface between grow_buffers() and
grow_dev_page(), and avoid the infinite loop beyond end of device by
instead checking init_page_buffers()'s end_block there (I presume that's
more efficient than a repeated call to blkdev_max_block()), returning
-ENXIO to __getblk_slow() in that case.
And remove akpm's ten-year-old "__getblk() cannot fail ... weird"
comment, but that is worrying: are all users of __getblk() really now
prepared for a NULL bh beyond end of device, or will some oops??
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.5
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Torsten Hilbrich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---
fs/buffer.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/buffer.c~block-replace-__getblk_slow-misfix-by-grow_dev_page-fix
fs/buffer.c
--- a/fs/buffer.c~block-replace-__getblk_slow-misfix-by-grow_dev_page-fix
+++ a/fs/buffer.c
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ link_dev_buffers(struct page *page, stru
/*
* Initialise the state of a blockdev page's buffers.
*/
-static void
+static sector_t
init_page_buffers(struct page *page, struct block_device *bdev,
sector_t block, int size)
{
@@ -936,33 +936,41 @@ init_page_buffers(struct page *page, str
block++;
bh = bh->b_this_page;
} while (bh != head);
+
+ /*
+ * Caller needs to validate requested block against end of device.
+ */
+ return end_block;
}
/*
* Create the page-cache page that contains the requested block.
*
- * This is user purely for blockdev mappings.
+ * This is used purely for blockdev mappings.
*/
-static struct page *
+static int
grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
- pgoff_t index, int size)
+ pgoff_t index, int size, int sizebits)
{
struct inode *inode = bdev->bd_inode;
struct page *page;
struct buffer_head *bh;
+ sector_t end_block;
+ int ret = 0; /* Will call free_more_memory() */
page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, index,
(mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS)|__GFP_MOVABLE);
if (!page)
- return NULL;
+ return ret;
BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
if (page_has_buffers(page)) {
bh = page_buffers(page);
if (bh->b_size == size) {
- init_page_buffers(page, bdev, block, size);
- return page;
+ end_block = init_page_buffers(page, bdev,
+ index << sizebits, size);
+ goto done;
}
if (!try_to_free_buffers(page))
goto failed;
@@ -982,14 +990,14 @@ grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev,
*/
spin_lock(&inode->i_mapping->private_lock);
link_dev_buffers(page, bh);
- init_page_buffers(page, bdev, block, size);
+ end_block = init_page_buffers(page, bdev, index << sizebits, size);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_mapping->private_lock);
- return page;
-
+done:
+ ret = (block < end_block) ? 1 : -ENXIO;
failed:
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
- return NULL;
+ return ret;
}
/*
@@ -999,7 +1007,6 @@ failed:
static int
grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
{
- struct page *page;
pgoff_t index;
int sizebits;
@@ -1023,22 +1030,14 @@ grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev,
bdevname(bdev, b));
return -EIO;
}
- block = index << sizebits;
+
/* Create a page with the proper size buffers.. */
- page = grow_dev_page(bdev, block, index, size);
- if (!page)
- return 0;
- unlock_page(page);
- page_cache_release(page);
- return 1;
+ return grow_dev_page(bdev, block, index, size, sizebits);
}
static struct buffer_head *
__getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
{
- int ret;
- struct buffer_head *bh;
-
/* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */
if (unlikely(size & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)-1) ||
(size < 512 || size > PAGE_SIZE))) {
@@ -1051,21 +1050,20 @@ __getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev,
return NULL;
}
-retry:
- bh = __find_get_block(bdev, block, size);
- if (bh)
- return bh;
+ for (;;) {
+ struct buffer_head *bh;
+ int ret;
- ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size);
- if (ret == 0) {
- free_more_memory();
- goto retry;
- } else if (ret > 0) {
bh = __find_get_block(bdev, block, size);
if (bh)
return bh;
+
+ ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return NULL;
+ if (ret == 0)
+ free_more_memory();
}
- return NULL;
}
/*
@@ -1321,10 +1319,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__find_get_block);
* which corresponds to the passed block_device, block and size. The
* returned buffer has its reference count incremented.
*
- * __getblk() cannot fail - it just keeps trying. If you pass it an
- * illegal block number, __getblk() will happily return a buffer_head
- * which represents the non-existent block. Very weird.
- *
* __getblk() will lock up the machine if grow_dev_page's try_to_free_buffers()
* attempt is failing. FIXME, perhaps?
*/
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are
origin.patch
x86-pat-remove-the-dependency-on-vm_pgoff-in-track-untrack-pfn-vma-routines.patch
x86-pat-separate-the-pfn-attribute-tracking-for-remap_pfn_range-and-vm_insert_pfn.patch
mm-x86-pat-rework-linear-pfn-mmap-tracking.patch
mm-introduce-arch-specific-vma-flag-vm_arch_1.patch
mm-kill-vma-flag-vm_insertpage.patch
mm-kill-vma-flag-vm_can_nonlinear.patch
mm-use-mm-exe_file-instead-of-first-vm_executable-vma-vm_file.patch
mm-kill-vma-flag-vm_executable-and-mm-num_exe_file_vmas.patch
mm-prepare-vm_dontdump-for-using-in-drivers.patch
mm-kill-vma-flag-vm_reserved-and-mm-reserved_vm-counter.patch
mm-mmapc-replace-find_vma_prepare-with-clearer-find_vma_links.patch
mm-mmu_notifier-fix-inconsistent-memory-between-secondary-mmu-and-host.patch
mm-mmu_notifier-fix-inconsistent-memory-between-secondary-mmu-and-host-fix.patch
mm-mmu_notifier-init-notifier-if-necessary.patch
thp-fix-the-count-of-thp_collapse_alloc.patch
thp-remove-unnecessary-check-in-start_khugepaged.patch
thp-move-khugepaged_mutex-out-of-khugepaged.patch
thp-remove-unnecessary-khugepaged_thread-check.patch
thp-remove-wake_up_interruptible-in-the-exit-path.patch
thp-remove-some-code-depend-on-config_numa.patch
thp-merge-page-pre-alloc-in-khugepaged_loop-into-khugepaged_do_scan.patch
thp-release-page-in-page-pre-alloc-path.patch
thp-introduce-khugepaged_prealloc_page-and-khugepaged_alloc_page.patch
thp-remove-khugepaged_loop.patch
thp-use-khugepaged_enabled-to-remove-duplicate-code.patch
thp-remove-unnecessary-set_recommended_min_free_kbytes.patch
prio_tree-debugging-patch.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
