On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 05:19:54PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 10:22 +0000, Luis Henriques wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 07:42:30PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 11:33 +0000, Luis Henriques wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 01:07:40AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 11:27 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 20:26 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:19 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 04:20 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:13:49PM +1100, Michael Ellerman > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > From: Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Commit 63f13448d81c910a284b096149411a719cbed501 upstream. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What stable kernel branch do you want this applied to? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just 3.18 thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't we need a similar fix to do_syscall_trace_enter() in earlier > > > > > > > versions? > > > > > > > > > > > > Probably. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd convinced myself there weren't any stable versions that were a) > > > > > > still alive > > > > > > and b) had ppc64le support. But it looks like I was wrong, 3.14 > > > > > > longterm is > > > > > > still going and does contain ppc64le. > > > > > > > > > > > > And maybe there are other "stable" branches out there that also > > > > > > need it? > > > > > > > > > > There are the unofficial 3.13.11-ckt and 3.16.7-ckt branches. There > > > > > is > > > > > also a 3.12 longterm branch but I'm not clear whether ppc64le worked > > > > > at > > > > > all in 3.12. > > > > > > > > Is there a patch with this fix, or would this be a stable-specific > > > > patch? I couldn't find anything commit but maybe I was looking at the > > > > wrong place. > > > > > > I guess something like this (untested): > > > > > > > Thanks a lot, Ben. I can queue this for the 3.16 kernel, but it would > > be awesome if I could get an extra Acked-by as I'm not able to test > > this patch. > > Sorry I've been trying to test this, but we had a network outage and then a > power outage .. it's been one of those weeks :) > > With this applied on 3.16.7 I see the same arch as I do on mainline, which I > think is sufficient proof that it's working: > > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1423462405.202:23): arch=c0000015 syscall=39 > success=yes ... > ^ > = 0x80000000 | 0x40000000 | 0x15 > = 64bit | LE | > EM_PPC64 > > So if you like you can add: > > Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> > Awesome, thanks a log Michael. I'll queue this for the next 3.16 release.
Cheers, -- Luís > cheers > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
