On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:31:41PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Greg KH wrote... > > > Note, No one actually tested the 3.0.31-rc1 patch I released, as it was > > broken (I generated it incorrectly) (...) > > D'oh. You got me. > > > I know the "this patch is in this release" emails are good for the > > review process, but does anyone even care about the -rc patches anymore? > > Are they just a waste of disk space and energy on my side in creating > > them? > > Please keep them. Usually I give them a try, this time however ... > release is what happens while you're busy debugging other software. > Would you rather like to receive an (informal) ACK, although it's > basically "patch applies, kernel builds and runs in some test > environments on i386, amd64 and armel"? In the past I decided to > remain silent in that case to keep the noise low.
ACKs are nice, but not needed. But if things fail, please let me know. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
