On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > Just one minor correction in this looney email thread: > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:53:22AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> v3.3.x on the other hand are *not* stable. They contain patches >> backported from v3.4, but nobody guarantees they will work. There was >> no v3.3.1-rc1, so the first time the patches compromising v3.3.1 were >> generally tested together is in v3.3.1, at which point if somebody >> finds issues, it's too late; bad patches are *not* going to be removed >> in v3.3.2. > > Of course there was a 3.3.1-rc1, see the linux-kernel archives for the > announcemen and the individual patches. kernel.org has the large patch > itself if you like that format instead.
I don't see it here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=tags If you really want people to try it, why not tag it? -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
