3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

commit 86b62a2cb4fc09037bbce2959d2992962396fd7f upstream.

Have ioctx_alloc() return an extra reference, so that caller would drop it
on success and not bother with re-grabbing it on failure exit.  The current
code is obviously broken - io_destroy() from another thread that managed
to guess the address io_setup() would've returned would free ioctx right
under us; gets especially interesting if aio_context_t * we pass to
io_setup() points to PROT_READ mapping, so put_user() fails and we end
up doing io_destroy() on kioctx another thread has just got freed...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 fs/aio.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static struct kioctx *ioctx_alloc(unsign
        mm = ctx->mm = current->mm;
        atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count);
 
-       atomic_set(&ctx->users, 1);
+       atomic_set(&ctx->users, 2);
        spin_lock_init(&ctx->ctx_lock);
        spin_lock_init(&ctx->ring_info.ring_lock);
        init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->wait);
@@ -1256,10 +1256,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(io_setup, unsigned, nr_e
        ret = PTR_ERR(ioctx);
        if (!IS_ERR(ioctx)) {
                ret = put_user(ioctx->user_id, ctxp);
-               if (!ret)
+               if (!ret) {
+                       put_ioctx(ioctx);
                        return 0;
-
-               get_ioctx(ioctx); /* io_destroy() expects us to hold a ref */
+               }
                io_destroy(ioctx);
        }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to