3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Marco Sanvido <[email protected]> commit 9e08e34e3735ae057eb3834da3570995811b7eb9 upstream. The comments quote the right parts of the spec: * d) Establish a unit attention condition for the * initiator port associated with every I_T nexus * that lost its registration other than the I_T * nexus on which the PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT command * was received, with the additional sense code set * to REGISTRATIONS PREEMPTED. and * e) Establish a unit attention condition for the initiator * port associated with every I_T nexus that lost its * persistent reservation and/or registration, with the * additional sense code set to REGISTRATIONS PREEMPTED; but the actual code accidentally uses ASCQ_2AH_RESERVATIONS_PREEMPTED instead of ASCQ_2AH_REGISTRATIONS_PREEMPTED. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Marco Sanvido <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- drivers/target/target_core_pr.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c @@ -3138,7 +3138,7 @@ static int core_scsi3_pro_preempt( if (!calling_it_nexus) core_scsi3_ua_allocate(pr_reg_nacl, pr_res_mapped_lun, 0x2A, - ASCQ_2AH_RESERVATIONS_PREEMPTED); + ASCQ_2AH_REGISTRATIONS_PREEMPTED); } spin_unlock(&pr_tmpl->registration_lock); /* @@ -3251,7 +3251,7 @@ static int core_scsi3_pro_preempt( * additional sense code set to REGISTRATIONS PREEMPTED; */ core_scsi3_ua_allocate(pr_reg_nacl, pr_res_mapped_lun, 0x2A, - ASCQ_2AH_RESERVATIONS_PREEMPTED); + ASCQ_2AH_REGISTRATIONS_PREEMPTED); } spin_unlock(&pr_tmpl->registration_lock); /* -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
