On 3/16/26 04:18, Mark Millard wrote: > On 3/15/26 21:18, Philip Paeps wrote: >> On 2026-03-13 21:53:48 (+0800), Olivier Certner wrote: >>> You are likely hitting a known problem, see thread "performance >>> regressions in 15.0". E.g., just picked one mail saying what I also >>> personally think about it: >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2025- >>> December/009623.html >>> (arguably, some RAM factories have burnt out for retail consumers >>> since then...) >>> >>> AFAIK, the default was never switched back, but if you're building >>> from source, a new knob was added to recover the previous behavior, see: >>> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=8d5a11cd0137d3ad >> >> Does this affect the package builders? > > Yes for the 15.* jails, the main jails [so: 16.0], and the future 14.4+ > jails.
I should have noted that releng/15.0 does not have WITH_LLVM_LINK_STATIC_LIBRARIES available but stable/15 does: its creation post-dated the 15.0 release and only stable/1[345] had the MFC done at the time. releng/14.4 has WITH_LLVM_LINK_STATIC_LIBRARIES available, as does main. > > (The 13.5 jails and the 14.3 jails do not have the problem.) releng/13.5 and releng/14.3 do not have WITH_LLVM_LINK_STATIC_LIBRARIES available but do not have the change that leads to needing the alternative. > >> Does that build fix go in the >> host or in the build jails? > > What primarily matters is how the world put in the build-jail was built. > >> >> Thanks. >> >> Philip [hat: cluster babysitter] >> >> > > -- === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com
