<quote who="Jonathan Angliss"> > Hello Concordio, > On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, Concordio M. Pajayat, Jr. wrote... > >> i've been using squirrelmail 1.2.6 on slackware 8.1 for more than 7 >> months and it was really rock solid. i was thinking of upgrading my >> current squirrelmail installation so i install >> squirrelmail-20021211_0041-CVS version on a different directory. > >> everything looks good on the current CVS version, however, when i >> login back to squirrelmail-1.2.6 my preferences file was replaced >> and all of my settings was gone. > > Do you mean you attempted to login to 1.2.6 whilst still logged into > the CVS version you got? Which CVS version did you get, there is a > devel and stable. >
Well, I do logout on the squirrelmail-20021211_0041-CVS before logging in to squirrelmail-1.2.6. > There is (was) a session merging issue that was uncovered a while > ago which caused a session to merge across users that were logged > into SM from the same browser (or two instances of the same > browser). I had believe originally I had fixed the issue, but it > cropped up, and last night I patched in some more code, and fixed it > in the stable release. Try using the CVS command to grab a copy of > the stable release. Or wait until later when the cvs snapshots are > regenerated. Unfortunately with the current system it is only > possible for one SquirrelMail instance to be active in a single > instance of a browser. In other words, you cannot login to 1.2.6 in > two copies of IE. > hmmmm... OK, maybe I'll keep squirrelmail-1.2.6 just in case someone wants to login multiple times. I'll try again the latest CVS on the squirrelmail site. >> data preferences directory was different on both installation. on >> squirrelmail-1.2.6, data directory was located outside the >> installation directory while on squirrelmail-20021211_0041-CVS, data >> directory was within the installation directory. > > Looking at the time stamp, I'm going with that being stable, and not > devel (devel seems to be 0040). Based on the time, I am not sure if > my changes managed to get in or not. > It was squirrelmail-1.2.11 I believe, so it must be the stable one. I am not using the devel one since there were issues on some plugins we are using. Hopefully if most of the plugins would be running smoothly on devel version, I'll upgrade to it immediately since I like the UI for this version. > -- > Jonathan Angliss > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > thank you very much for the inputs. --conpaj-- open source technology enthusiast pilipino internet, inc. |-- "Go beyond the quest for information!" - http://www.pilnet.com/ |-- Sent through PILNET WebMail System - http://webmail.pilnet.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
