On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Drunkard Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/8/11 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <[email protected]>: >> Hi! >> >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Stand H <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> --- On Mon, 8/9/10, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] how much traffic can squid handle? >>>> To: "Drunkard Zhang" <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: "Stand H" <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>> Date: Monday, August 9, 2010, 6:26 PM >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Drunkard Zhang <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > >>>> > BTW, may bonding of multiple NICs helps on too many >>>> interrupts. >>>> > >>>> >>>> Or maybe just a good NIC, or a GOOD NIC + bonding :) >>>> >>> >>> Can you recommend a good NIC? >> >> Most Intel have behaved really well with me. As for Broadcom: bad >> luck, I had to disable most of the "hardware assistance", and thus: >> add more load to the server, I'm currently on a "avoid Broadcom" >> policy, but that could change in the future (I'll try them again >> sometime). >> > I got bottle on forcedeth shipped with nVidia MCP55 chipset, not got > problem on Intel e1000e yet, but CPU usage on Intel cores balanced > badly. On the other hand CPU time usage on AMD Opteron cores balanced > very good with same configuration, so confuse about this. >
Yeah, e1000 have worked very well for me. Ok, so, you saw that CPU usage on Intel tends to be "inclined" to one of the cores? and on AMD it gets more "balanced"? Also, are talking about network related load here? or just about any processes running on Intel multi-core and AMD multicore.
