Anybody have performance experience (or benchmark results) putting Squid's
cache on a Flash Drive?
Devices that plug into a disk cable but that contain only what you'd find in a
thumb drive are available. They have zero latency and they have much faster
transfer speed than a moving disk. On the other hand they don't have any
internal cache memory; even small repetetive accesses always go directly to the
flash memory. (A regular hard drive typically has 4-32MB cache memory, so
although overall access is only as fast as the disk spins, a few repetetive
accesses can be very fast.) How do these two opposing tendencies (better
average transfer rate but no internal cache memory) net out with Squid's cache
access pattern?
For a Squid cache, am I better off buying a small but really fast hard drive,
or one of these flash drive substitutes?
-Chuck Kollars
