> On 27 Jan 2016, at 14:00 PM, Christophe Fergeau <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 01:51:12PM +0200, Dmitry Fleytman wrote: >> Hello, Spice List >> >> I just got a confirmation that UsbDk backend integration for libusb was >> pushed upstream: >> >> 24c5289 build: Integrate usbdk backend >> 8823c17 usbdk: Introduce usbdk backend >> 5d83aba windows: Rename windows_usb.h/c windows_winusb.h/c >> 92a3278 windows: Move common definitions to a separate file >> >> (see at https://github.com/libusb/libusb/commits/master) > > Didn't > https://github.com/libusb/libusb/commit/cdfe236931ef3fd06adac0fdf6df49baa39ff35e > reintroduce the bug where if there are usbdk issues, > libusb_init() will fail the first time it's called, and then report > success without doing any initialisation?
(looping Chris) Hi Chris, There is an opinion that commit (https://github.com/libusb/libusb/commit/cdfe236931ef3fd06adac0fdf6df49baa39ff35e) is problematic (see above). If so, there is the symmetrical problem with WinUsb backend as well. What do you think? Thanks, Dmitry > >> >> Is it a time to push UsbDk backend and asynchronous redirection series to >> spice-gtk upstream? > > Yes, we can move forward with the ustream integration now (final review > and push). Great! Thanks Christophe. > > Christophe ~Dmitry _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
