Hi On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Jonathon Jongsma <[email protected]> wrote: > I find this name a little inconsistent. Generally the first part of the > function name indicates the type of object that this method belongs to.
Except constructors, like here. > So I'd expect channel_webdav_server_new() to take a SpiceWebdavChannel* > as its first argument, but it takes a SpiceSession* instead. So it seems > that spice_session_webdav_server_new() would be a more appropriate name? > Maybe even move it along to spice-session.c since its only caller just > got moved there? It can't easily, the constructor sets up callback in channel-webdav. -- Marc-André Lureau _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
