On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:09:46PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange > <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's debatable IMHO - 'make clean' should remove anything that was > > created by a preivous 'make'. While 'make distclean' should remove > > anything created by './configure'. If you really want to cache > > generated files, then it is reasonable to move some items out of > > 'clean' and into 'distclean'. > > It depends if you ship the generated file and have tarball build > dependency on what is needed to generate it. > > In our case, we tried to reduce the amount of dependencies (python & > perl & others - I am not even sure which one is still needed) > > So "make clean" shouldn't remove those files.
Oh sure, if you ship them in the tar.gz then you need to put them in the maintainer-clean rule instead. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
