Also, does anyone have the Solr or Lucene bug # for this?
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Brett Hoerner <br...@bretthoerner.com>
wrote:
> Interesting, is there a performance impact to sending the *:*?
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, there's a known bug that a negative-only query within parentheses
>> doesn't match properly - you need to add a non-negative term, such as
>> "*:*". For example:
>>
>> text:(+"happy") AND user:(*:* -"123456789")
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Brett Hoerner
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 2:51 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Confusion about location of + and - ?
>>
>>
>> Can anyone explain the difference between these two queries?
>>
>> text:(+"happy") AND -user:("123456789") = numFound 2912224
>>
>> But
>>
>> text:(+"happy") AND user:(-"123456789") = numFound 0
>>
>> Now, you may just say "then just put - infront of your field, duh!" Well,
>>
>> text:(+"happy") = numFound 2912224
>> user:(-"123456789") = numFound 465998192
>>
>> (FWIW there is no user named 123456789 in my index)
>>
>> As you can see, the queries work alone, but when combined with an AND I
>> always get 0 results. If I move the - before the field in my query, it
>> works. What am I missing here?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
>
