Vinay,
pls upload your index dir somewhere, I can try to check what's wrong with
it.


On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Vinay B, <vybe3...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Yes, the query ATTRIBUTES.STATE:TX returns the child doc (see response
> below) . Is there something else that I'm missing to link the parent and
> the child? I followed your advice from my last thread and used a block join
> in this attempt, but still don't see how the parent and child realize their
> association. We're using solr 4.8.1
>
> Thanks
>
> Query Response
>
> {
>   "responseHeader":{
>     "status":0,
>     "QTime":0,
>     "params":{
>       "indent":"true",
>       "q":"ATTRIBUTES.STATE:TX",
>       "wt":"json"}},
>   "response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[
>       {
>         "id":"1-A",
>         "ATTRIBUTES.STATE":["LA",
>           "TX"]}]
>   }}
>
>
> Raw doc dump
>
> {
>   "responseHeader":{
>     "status":0,
>     "QTime":0,
>     "params":{
>       "indent":"true",
>       "q":"*:*",
>       "wt":"json"}},
>   "response":{"numFound":2,"start":0,"docs":[
>       {
>         "id":"1-A",
>         "ATTRIBUTES.STATE":["LA",
>           "TX"]},
>       {
>         "id":"1",
>         "content_type":"parentDocument",
>         "_version_":1471814208097091584}]
>   }}
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
> mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
>
> > did you run the underneath query ATTRIBUTES.
> > STATE:TX. does it return anything?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Vinay B, <vybe3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Okay, Let me try again.
> > >
> > > 1. Here is some sample SolrJ code that creates a parent and child
> > document
> > > (I hope)
> > > https://gist.github.com/anonymous/d03747661ef03923de74
> > >
> > > 2. I tried a block join query which didn't return any results (I tried
> > the
> > > "Block Join Parent Query Parser" approach described in this link
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers). I
> > > expected
> > > to get back the parent doc of a child which has ATTRIBUTES.STATE:TX,
> > which
> > > I did not , That is what I'm trying to figure out.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > http://localhost:8088/solr/test_core/select?q={!parent
> > >
> >
> which="content_type:parentDocument"}ATTRIBUTES.STATE:TX&wt=json&indent=true
> > >
> > > (
> > > equivalent to
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://localhost:8088/solr/test_core/select?q=%7b!parent+which%3d%22content_type%3aparentDocument%22%7dATTRIBUTES.STATE%3aTX%26wt%3djson%26indent%3dtrue
> > > )
> > >
> > > Resulting in
> > > <response>
> > > <lst name="responseHeader">
> > > <int name="status">0</int>
> > > <int name="QTime">1</int>
> > > <lst name="params">
> > > <str name="q">
> > > {!parent
> > >
> >
> which="content_type:parentDocument"}ATTRIBUTES.STATE:TX&wt=json&indent=true
> > > </str>
> > > </lst>
> > > </lst>
> > > <result name="response" numFound="0" start="0"/>
> > > </response>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Erick Erickson <
> erickerick...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, what  do you mean by "not working"? You might review:
> > > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Erick
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Vinay B, <vybe3...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I've been trying to experiment with block joins and parent / child
> > docs
> > > > as
> > > > > described in this thread (input described in my first post of the
> > > thread,
> > > > > .. and block join in my second post, as per the suggestions given).
> > > What
> > > > > else am I missing?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Why-aren-t-my-nested-documents-nesting-tt4142702.html#none
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours
> > Mikhail Khludnev
> > Principal Engineer,
> > Grid Dynamics
> >
> > <http://www.griddynamics.com>
> >  <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
> >
>



-- 
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Principal Engineer,
Grid Dynamics

<http://www.griddynamics.com>
 <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>

Reply via email to