Thanks for the information Yonik.
> -----Original Message----- > From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik > Seeley > Sent: May-16-14 8:52 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Question regarding the lastest version of HeliosSearch > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Jean-Sebastien Vachon <jean- > sebastien.vac...@wantedanalytics.com> wrote: > > I spent some time today playing around with subfacets and facets functions > now available in helios search 0.05 and I have some concerns... They look > very promising . > > Thanks, glad for the feedback! > > [...] > > the response looks good except for one little thing... the mincount is not > respected whenever I specify the facet.stat parameter. Removing it will > cause the mincount to be respected but then I need this parameter. > > Right, the mincount parameter is not yet implemented. Hopefully soon! > > > { > > > > "val":1133, > > > > "unique(job_id)":0, <== what is this? > > > > "count":0}, > > .... Many zero entries following... > > > > I was wondering where the extra entries were coming from... the > > position_id = 1133 above is not even a match for my query (its title is > > "Audit > Consultant") I`ve also noticed a similar behaviour when using subfacets. It > looks like the number of items returned always match the "facet.limit" > parameter. > > If not enough values are present for a given entry then the bucket is filled > with documents not matching the original query. > > Right... straight Solr faceting will do this too (unless you have a > mincount>0). We're just looking at terms in the field and we don't > have enough context to know if some 0's make more sense than others to > return. > > -Yonik > http://heliosearch.org - facet functions, subfacets, off-heap > filters&fieldcache > > ----- > Aucun virus trouvé dans ce message. > Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr > Version: 2014.0.4570 / Base de données virale: 3931/7453 - Date: > 07/05/2014 La Base de données des virus a expiré.
