Thanks vineet

With Regards
Aman Tandon


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Vineet Mishra <clearmido...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I did it with Tomcat and Zookeeper Ensemble, will mail you the steps
> shortly.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Vineet please share after you setup for solr cloud
> > Are you using jetty or tomcat.?
> >
> > On Saturday, April 19, 2014, Vineet Mishra <clearmido...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Thanks Furkan, I will definitely give it a try then.
> > >
> > > Thanks again!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Vineet;
> > >>
> > >> I've been using SolrCloud for such kind of Big Data and I think that
> you
> > >> should consider to use it. If you have any problems you can ask it
> here.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks;
> > >> Furkan KAMACI
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2014-04-15 13:20 GMT+03:00 Vineet Mishra <clearmido...@gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi All,
> > >> >
> > >> > I have worked with Solr 3.5 to implement real time search on some
> > 100GB
> > >> > data, that worked fine but was little slow on complex
> queries(Multiple
> > >> > group/joined queries).
> > >> > But now I want to index some real Big Data(around 4 TB or even
> more),
> > can
> > >> > SolrCloud be solution for it if not what could be the best possible
> > >> > solution in this case.
> > >> >
> > >> > *Stats for the previous Implementation:*
> > >> > It was Master Slave Architecture with normal Standalone multiple
> > instance
> > >> > of Solr 3.5. There were around 12 Solr instance running on different
> > >> > machines.
> > >> >
> > >> > *Things to consider for the next implementation:*
> > >> > Since all the data is sensor data hence it is the factor of
> duplicity
> > and
> > >> > uniqueness.
> > >> >
> > >> > *Really urgent, please take the call on priority with set of
> feasible
> > >> > solution.*
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from Gmail Mobile
> >
>

Reply via email to