I guess you can apply some deboost for URL.
Lakshmi it will be more helpful to suggest if you also provide some kind of
example about what you want to achieve
On Saturday, April 19, 2014, A Laxmi <a.lakshmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Markus, like I mentioned in my last email, I have got the qf with title,
> content and url. That doesn't help a whole lot. Could you please advise if
> there are any other parameters that I should consider for solr request
> handler config or the numbers I have got for title, content, url in qf
> parameter have to be modified?
>
> Thanks for your help..
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:08 PM, A Laxmi <a.lakshmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Markus, Yes, you are right. I passed the qf from my front-end
framework
>> (PHP which uses SolrClient). This is how I got it set-up:
>>
>> $this->solr->set_param('defType','edismax');
>> $this->solr->set_param('qf','title^10 content^5 url^5');
>>
>> where you can see qf = title^10 content^5 url^5
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Markus Jelsma <
markus.jel...@openindex.io
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, replicating full features search engine behaviour is not going to
>>> work with nutch and solr out of the box. You are missing a thousand
>>> features such as proper main content extraction, deduplication,
>>> classification of content and hub or link pages, and much more. These
>>> things are possible to implement but you may want to start with having
you
>>> solr request handler better configured, to begin with, your qf parameter
>>> does not have nutchs default title and content field selected.
>>>
>>>
>>> A Laxmi <a.lakshmi...@gmail.com> schreef:Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> When I started to compare the search results with the two options
below, I
>>> see a lot of difference in the search results esp. the* urls that show
up
>>> on the top *(*Relevancy *perspective).
>>>
>>> (1) Nutch 2.2.1 (with *Solr 4.0*)
>>> (2) Bing custom search set-up
>>>
>>> I wonder how should I tweak the boost parameters to get the best results
>>> on
>>> the top like how Bing, Google does.
>>>
>>> Please suggest why I see a difference and what parameters are best to
>>> configure in Solr to achieve what I see from Bing, or Google search
>>> relevancy.
>>>
>>> Here is what i got in solrconfig.xml:
>>>
>>> <str name="defType">edismax</str>
>>> <str name="qf">
>>> text^0.5 features^1.0 name^1.2 sku^1.5 id^10.0 manu^1.1 cat^1.4
>>> </str>
>>> <str name="q.alt">*:*</str>
>>> <str name="rows">10</str>
>>> <str name="fl">*,score</str>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
