Using 16G for a 360G index is probably pushing things. A lot. I'm
actually a bit surprised that the problem only occurs when you delete
docs....

The simplest thing would be to increase the JVM memory. You should be
looking at your index to see how big it is, be sure to subtract out
the *.fdt and *.fdx files, those are used for verbatim copies of the
raw data and don't really count towards the memory requirements.

I suspect you're just not giving enough memory to your JVM and this is
just the first OOM you've hit. Look on the Solr admin page and see how
much is being reported, if it's near the limit of your 16G that's the
"smoking gun"...

Best,
Erick

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Vinay Pothnis <poth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry - yes, I meant to say leader.
> Each JVM has 16G of memory.
>
>
> On 10 April 2014 20:54, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> First, there is no "master" node, just leaders and replicas. But that's a
>> nit.
>>
>> No real clue why you would be going out of memory. Deleting a
>> document, even by query should just mark the docs as deleted, a pretty
>> low-cost operation.
>>
>> how much memory are you giving the JVM?
>>
>> Best,
>> Erick
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Vinay Pothnis <poth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > [solr version 4.3.1]
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I have a solr cloud (4 nodes - 2 shards) with a fairly large amount
>> > documents (~360G of index per shard). Now, a major portion of the data is
>> > not required and I need to delete those documents. I would need to delete
>> > around 75% of the data.
>> >
>> > One of the solutions could be to drop the index completely re-index. But
>> > this is not an option at the moment.
>> >
>> > When we tried to delete the data through a query - say 1 day/month's
>> worth
>> > of data. But after deleting just 1 month's worth of data, the master node
>> > is going out of memory - heap space.
>> >
>> > Wondering is there any way to incrementally delete the data without
>> > affecting the cluster adversely.
>> >
>> > Thank!
>> > Vinay
>>

Reply via email to