Oh my bad. I thought it was already in. Thanks for the correction. Ta, Greg
On 17 March 2014 15:55, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinman...@gmail.com>wrote: > Greg, SOLR-4735 (using the codahale metrics lib) hasn't been committed > yet. It is still work in progress. > > Actually the internal Solr Metrics class has a method to return 1 > minute stats but it is not used. > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Greg Pendlebury > <greg.pendleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In the codahale metrics library there are 1, 5 and 15 minute moving > > averages just like you would see in a tool like 'top'. However in Solr I > > can only see 5 and 15 minute values, plus 'avgRequestsPerSecond'. I > assumed > > this was the 1 minute value initially, but it seems to be something like > > the average since startup. I haven't looked thoroughly, but it is around > 1% > > of the other two in a normally idle test cluster after load tests have > been > > running for long enough that the 5 and 15 minute numbers match the load > > testing throughput. > > > > Is this difference deliberate? or an accident? or am I wrong entirely? I > > can compute the overall average anyway, given that the stats also include > > the start time of the search handler and the total search count, so I > > thought it might be an accident. > > > > Ta, > > Greg > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4 May 2013 01:19, Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Does anybody tested Ganglia with JMXTrans at production environment for > >> SolrCloud? > >> > >> 2013/4/26 Dmitry Kan <solrexp...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > Alan, Shawn, > >> > > >> > If backporting to 3.x is hard, no worries, we don't necessarily > require > >> the > >> > patch as we are heading to 4.x eventually. It is just much easier > within > >> > our organization to test on the existing solr 3.4 as there are a few > of > >> > internal dependencies and custom code on top of solr. Also solr > upgrades > >> on > >> > production systems are usually pushed forward by a month or so > starting > >> the > >> > upgrade on development systems (requires lots of testing and > >> > verifications). > >> > > >> > Nevertheless, it is good effort to make #solr #graphite friendly, so > keep > >> > it up! :) > >> > > >> > Dmitry > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Shawn Heisey <s...@elyograg.org> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > On 4/25/2013 6:30 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > >> > > > We are very much interested in 3.4. > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Alan Woodward <a...@flax.co.uk> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> This is on top of trunk at the moment, but would be back ported > to > >> 4.4 > >> > > if > >> > > >> there was interest. > >> > > > >> > > This will be bad news, I'm sorry: > >> > > > >> > > All remaining work on 3.x versions happens in the 3.6 branch. This > >> > > branch is in maintenance mode. It will only get fixes for serious > bugs > >> > > with no workaround. Improvements and new features won't be > considered > >> > > at all. > >> > > > >> > > You're welcome to try backporting patches from newer issues. Due to > >> the > >> > > major differences in the 3x and 4x codebases, the best case > scenario is > >> > > that you'll be facing a very manual task. Some changes can't be > >> > > backported because they rely on other features only found in 4.x > code. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Shawn > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >
