Glad to hear it! Thanks for bringing closure... Erick
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Chris W <chris1980....@gmail.com> wrote: > We decided to go with the latest (it seems to have a lot more bug > /performance fixes). The issue i mentioned was a red herring. I was able to > successfully upgrade > > > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Chris W <chris1980....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Moving 4 versions ahead may need much additional tests from my side to >> ensure our cluster performance is good and within our SLA. Moving to 4.4 >> (just 1 month after 4.3.1 was released) gives me the most important bug >> fix for reloading collections (which does not work now and have to do a >> rolling restart) >> >> I am also ok upgrading to 4.5 but do not want to go too far without more >> testing >> >> Either way i think i will hit the issue mentioned above >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Erick Erickson >> <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> First I have to ask why you're going to 4.4 rather than 4.7. I >>> understand vetting requirements, but I thought I'd ask.... No use >>> going through this twice if you can avoid it. >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Chris W <chris1980....@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > I am running solrcloud version 4.3.0 with a 10 m1.xlarge nodes and >>> using >>> > zk to manage the state/data for collections and configs.I want to >>> upgrade >>> > to version 4.4.0. >>> > >>> > >>> > When i deploy a 4.4 version of solrcloud in my test environment, none of >>> > the collections/configs (created using the 4.3 version of solr) that >>> exist >>> > in zk show up in the core admin. I should also mention that, all of my >>> > collection configs for solrconfig.xml have >>> > >>> > <luceneMatchVersion>LUCENE_43</luceneMatchVersion>. >>> > >>> > Should i change the lucene version to match lucene_44 (match solr >>> > version?) to get it working again? >>> > >>> > What is the best way to upgrade to a newer version of solrcloud without >>> > deleting and recreating all configs and collections? >>> > >>> > Kindly advise >>> > -- >>> > Best >>> > -- >>> > C >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best >> -- >> C >> > > > > -- > Best > -- > C
