Correct, Steve. Alternatively you can also put this option in your query
after the end of the last parenthesis, as in this example from the wiki:

  fq=geo:"IsWithin(POLYGON((-10 30, -40 40, -10 -20, 40 20, 0 0, -10 30)))
distErrPct=0"

~ David


Steven Bower wrote
> Only points in the index.. Am I correct this won't require a reindex?
> 
> On Monday, March 10, 2014, Smiley, David W. <

> dsmiley@

> > wrote:
> 
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> Set distErrPct to 0 in order to get non-point shapes to always be as
>> accurate as maxDistErr.  Point shapes are always that accurate.  As long
>> as
>> you only index points, not other shapes (you don't index polygons, etc.)
>> then distErrPct of 0 should be fine.  In fact, perhaps a future Solr
>> version should simply use 0 as the default; the last time I did
>> benchmarks
>> it was pretty marginal impact of higher distErrPct.
>>
>> It's a fairly different story if you are indexing non-point shapes.
>>
>> ~ David
>>
>> From: Steven Bower <

> smb-apache@

>  <javascript:;>
> <mailto:
>>
>  

> smb-apache@

>  &lt;javascript:;&gt;>>
>> Reply-To: "

> solr-user@.apache

>  &lt;javascript:;&gt;
> <mailto:
>>
>  

> solr-user@.apache

>  &lt;javascript:;&gt;>" &lt;

> solr-user@.apache

> &lt;javascript:;&gt;
>> &lt;mailto:

> solr-user@.apache

>  &lt;javascript:;&gt;>>
>> Date: Monday, March 10, 2014 at 4:23 PM
>> To: "

> solr-user@.apache

>  &lt;javascript:;&gt;
> <mailto:
>>
>  

> solr-user@.apache

>  &lt;javascript:;&gt;>" &lt;

> solr-user@.apache

> &lt;javascript:;&gt;
>> &lt;mailto:

> solr-user@.apache

>  &lt;javascript:;&gt;>>
>> Subject: Re: Issue with spatial search
>>
>> Minor edit to the KML to adjust color of polygon
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Steven Bower &lt;

> smb-apache@

> &lt;javascript:;&gt;
>> &lt;mailto:

> smb-apache@

>  &lt;javascript:;&gt;>> wrote:
>> I am seeing a "error" when doing a spatial search where a particular
>> point
>> is showing up within a polygon, but by all methods I've tried that point
>> is
>> not within the polygon..
>>
>> First the point is: 41.2299,29.1345 (lat/lon)
>>
>> The polygon is:
>>
>> 31.2719,32.283
>> 31.2179,32.3681
>> 31.1333,32.3407
>> 30.9356,32.6318
>> 31.0707,34.5196
>> 35.2053,36.9415
>> 37.2959,36.6339
>> 40.8334,30.4273
>> 41.1622,29.1421
>> 41.6484,27.4832
>> 47.0255,13.6342
>> 43.9457,3.17525
>> 37.0029,-5.7017
>> 35.7741,-5.57719
>> 34.801,-4.66201
>> 33.345,10.0157
>> 29.6745,18.9366
>> 30.6592,29.1683
>> 31.2719,32.283
>>
>> The geo field we are using has this config:
>>
>> 
> <fieldType name="location_rpt"
>>
>             class="solr.SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType"
>>            distErrPct="0.025"
>>            maxDistErr="0.000009"
>>
>> 
>> spatialContextFactory="com.spatial4j.core.context.jts.JtsSpatialContextFactory"
>>            units="degrees"/>
>>
>> The config is basically the same as the one from the docs...
>>
>> They query I am issuing is this:
>>
>> location:"Intersects(POLYGON((32.283 31.2719, 32.3681 31.2179, 32.3407
>> 31.1333, 32.6318 30.9356, 34.5196 31.0707, 36.9415 35.2053, 36.6339
>> 37.2959, 30.4273 40.8334, 29.1421 41.1622, 27.4832 41.6484, 13.6342
>> 47.0255, 3.17525 43.9457, -5.7017 37.0029, -5.57719 35.7741, -4.66201
>> 34.801, 10.0157 33.345, 18.9366 29.6745, 29.1683 30.6592, 32.283
>> 31.2719)))"
>>
>> and it brings back a result where the "location" field is 41.2299,29.1345
>>
>> I've attached a KML with the polygon and the point and you can see from
>> that, visually, that the point is not within the polygon. I also tried in
>> google maps API but after playing around realize that the polygons in
>> maps
>> are draw in Euclidian space while the map itself is a Mercator
>> projection..
>> Loading the kml in earth fixes this issue but the point still lays
>> outside
>> the polygon.. The distance between the edge of the polygon closes to the
>> point and the point itself is ~1.2 miles which is much larger than the
>> 1meter accuracy given by the maxDistErr (per the docs).
>>
>> Any thoughts on this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>





-----
 Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Issue-with-spatial-search-tp4122690p4122744.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to