I believe SolrJ uses XML under the covers. If so, I don't think you would improve performance by switching to SolrJ, since the client would convert it to XML before sending it on the wire.
Toby ******************************* Toby Lazar Capital Technology Group Email: tla...@capitaltg.com Mobile: 646-469-5865 ******************************* On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > One thing to consider is, I think solrnet use xml update, there is xml > parsing overhead with it. > Switching to solrJ or CSV can cause additional gain. > > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveIndexingSpeed > > Ahmet > > > On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 10:13 PM, sweety <sweetyshind...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > I will surely read about JVM Garbage collection. Thanks a lot, all of you. > > But, is the time required for my indexing good enough? I dont know about > the > ideal timings. > I think that my indexing is taking more time. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/to-reduce-indexing-time-tp4121391p4121483.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
