Hi,
Thanks for replying but if i understand right:
q=term1 term2^0.6 means it will search for term1 and term2 and somewhat less
boost to term2, 

I want to search only for term1 and if the term2 exists boost by a positive
factor . I am not able to make such a query .

Thanks
Abhishek 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2014 8:51 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Special character search in Solr and boosting without
> altering the resultset
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Can you elaborate your boosting requirement? There is a carat operator
> to boost query terms.
> 
> for example : q=term1 term2^0.6
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Saturday, February 1, 2014 1:51 PM, abhishek jain
> <abhishek.netj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Ok thanks, will look more into it,
> 
> Any info on boosting without altering the resultset?
> 
> Thanks
> Abhishek
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > Hi Abhishek,
> >
> > dot is not a special character. Your field type / analyzer is
> > stripping that character. Please see similar discussions and
> > alternative solutions.
> >
> > http://search-lucene.com/m/6dbI9zMSob1
> > http://search-lucene.com/m/Ac71G0KlGz
> > http://search-lucene.com/m/RRD2D1p1mi
> >
> > Ahmet
> >
> >
> >
> > On Friday, January 31, 2014 8:23 PM, abhishek jain
> > <abhishek.netj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi friends,
> >
> > I am facing a strange problem, When I search a term eg     .Net   ,
> > the solr searches for Net and not includes '.'
> >
> > Is dot a special character in Solr? I tried escaping it with
> backslash
> > in the url call to solr, but no use same resultset,
> >
> >
> >
> > Also , is there a way to boost some terms within a resultset.
> >
> > I mean I want to boost a term within a result and I don't want to
> fire
> > a separate query. I couldn't use OR operator as it will modify the
> > resultset.
> > I want to use a single query and boost. I don't want to use dismax
> > query as well,
> >
> >
> >
> > Please advice.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Abhishek

Reply via email to