It sounds quite obvious to upgrade the java environment to go on with that.

We are updating our index almost every second and so over time it counts up a lot of segment files (up to 32 in our case). So optimizing was always a good idea in the SOLR 3.X world. We regocnized that in SOLR 4.4.0 it does not hit performance that bad if the index is not optimized for a period of time. But we like to avoid getting to much segments at once.

Today I will run one more checkIndex run against the now turned off SOLR instance.
Maybe there will be some enlightment then.

Bet regards
Ralf Matulat

Am 13.01.14 21:15, schrieb Michael McCandless:
I have trouble understanding J9's version strings ... but, is it
really from 2008?  You could be hitting a JVM bug; can you test
upgrading?

I don't have much experience with Solr faceting on optimized vs
unoptimized indices; maybe someone else can answer your question.

Lucene's facet module (not yet exposed through Solr) performance
shouldn't change much for optimized vs unoptimized indices.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com



Reply via email to