Hi Ahmet,
It seems like it will bring more complexity than what I did. But of
course it is easily customizable.Worthy alternate approach to think
of.Thanks.
Thanks & Regards,
Senthilnathan v
Thanks & Regards,
Senthilnathan V
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Senthilnathan,
>
> I not 100% sure but I https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5005could be
> used such cases.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:56 PM, Senthilnathan Vijayaraja <
> senthilnat...@8kmiles.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my query format is,
>
> q=(price_min:[100000 TO 800000] OR price_max:[100000 TO 800000])AND
> (size_min:[1000 TO 5000] OR size_max:[1000 TO 5000])....
>
> if this query returns 0 results then
> -->fire a fallback query after changing the value of size_min and
> size_max
> q=(price_min:[100000 TO 800000] OR price_max:[100000 TO 800000])AND
> (size_min:[100 TO 500] OR size_max:[100 TO 500])
> if, again it gives 0 results then
> -->fire a fallback query after changing the value of price_min and
> price_max
> q=(price_min:[1000 TO 8000] OR price_max:[1000 TO 8000])AND
> (size_min:[100 TO 500] OR size_max:[100 TO 500])
>
> I wrote a custom request handler to achieve this and now it is
> working fine but in my code,
>
> I got the value of 'q' param like,
>
> String[] paramVals = reqParams.getParams("q");//(price_min:[100000
> TO 800000] OR price_max:[100000 TO 800000])AND (size_min:[1000 TO 5000] OR
> size_max:[1000 TO 5000])
>
> and manually replaced the price_min,price_max,size_min,size_max
> values using string functions,there by I formed two LocalRequests for
> handling this.
>
>
> Is there any better way to handle this,I want this to be more
> configurable..???
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Senthilnathan V
>
>
