On Dec 16, 2013, at 12:58 PM, Tim Potter <tim.pot...@lucidworks.com> wrote:
> The only trick here is you need to set the name of the core, which from what > I can tell can be arbitrary Yup. > but I chose to use the same naming standard as the other cores Which is likely a good idea - those names are used mainly for oversharding (you might have more than one core on a node from the same collection and shard). Probably better to use a naming scheme that is friendly to this in the long run, and the default naming scheme is. Also less confusing to match the default naming scheme. - Mark
