More info on Cpu consumption: We have a server with 32 physical cores. Same search when executed on SOLR 4.6 takes quite long and throughout only uses 3% cpu (1 core).
Same search when executed on SOLR 1.4.1 takes much less time and on average uses around 40-50% cpu. On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Salman Akram < salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net> wrote: > I missed one imp piece of info. Due to large size we have indexed the date > with Common Grams. All of the words in slow search are in common grams and > when I debug it, they query is made properly with common grams. > > In debug all of the time is shown in process query time. > > Let me know what other info you need? Thanks > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Andrea Gazzarini > <agazzar...@apache.org>wrote: > >> Hi, I did moreless the same but didn't get that behaviour...could you give >> us more details >> >> Best, >> Gazza >> On 5 Dec 2013 06:54, "Salman Akram" <salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > We recently upgraded to SOLR 4.6 from SOLR 1.4.1. Overall the >> performance >> > went down for large phrase queries. On some analysis we have seen that >> > 1.4.1 utilized multiple cpu cores for such queries but SOLR 4.6 is only >> > utilizing single cpu core. Any idea on what could be the reason? >> > >> > Note: We are not using SOLR Sharding. >> > >> > -- >> > Regards, >> > >> > Salman Akram >> > >> > > > > -- > Regards, > > Salman Akram > > -- Regards, Salman Akram
