Thanks for your answers. The problem with the use of the field function is that it only works for non multivalued fields.
Regards. El 28/11/2013 15:54, "Jack Krupansky" <j...@basetechnology.com> escribió: > If you have chosen to use improper field names, then in the fl parameter > you need to reference them using the "field" function: > > fl=id,field(01text) > > The basic concept is that Solr doesn't ban improper field names, but that > they don't work in all contexts. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -----Original Message----- From: Ahmet Arslan > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:24 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Expansion of fields in fl parameter > > Hi Alvaro, > > That's really weird. When choosing field names it is recommend to use java > variable naming conventions. > > Can you change field names to text_01 , text01 and try again? Problem > still exists? > > Do you have dynamicField definitions? What happens when you request all > fields (fl=*)? > > > > > On Thursday, November 28, 2013 3:59 PM, Alvaro Cabrerizo < > topor...@gmail.com> wrote: > The question: > > ¿Is there a way to avoid field expansion when adding > fl<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fl>parameter to > the request? > > The environment: > > Solr 4.4 using the next schema.xml > > <field name="id" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" required="true" > /> > <field name="01_text" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" /> > <field name="01text" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" /> > <field name="text" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" /> > > The test has been done importing the next data: > > {"id": "1","text": "text","01text": "text","01_text": "text"} > > The testing: > > Query and response 1: > > q=id:1&fl=id,01text > > The response includes a field that doesnt exists "01" and an existing one > (text) that I dont want to return. > > {"id":"1","text":"text","01text":"text","01":1} > > I expect the next response > > {"id":"1","01text":"text"} > > > Query and response 2 > > q=id:1&fl=id,01_text > > {"id":"1","01_text":"text","01":1} > > > I expect the next response: > > > {"id":"1","01_text":"text"} > > > In both cases, I just want to return the fields included in fl. > > Regards. >
