It's certainly seems to be faster (in my limited testing). I just don't want to base my software on the Luke scripts if they're prone to changing in the future.
And yes, I realize there are ways to make this secure. I just wanted to know if it's something I should avoid doing (perhaps for reasons beyond my comprehension.) Thanks! -D > On Nov 27, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Stefan Matheis <matheis.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Since your users shouldn't be allowed at any time to access Solr directly, > it's up to you to implement that on the client side anyway? > > I can't tell if there is a technical difference between the two calls you > named, but i'd guess that the second might be a more direct way to access > this information (and probably a bit faster?). > > -Stefan > > >> On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Dave Seltzer wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to get a list of top terms for a field called "Tags". >> >> One way to do this would be to query all data *:* and then facet by the >> Tags column: >> /solr/collection/admin/select?q=*:*&rows=0&facet=true&facet.field=Tags >> >> I've noticed another way to do this is using the luke interface like this: >> /solr/collection/admin/luke?fl=Tags&numTerms=20 >> >> One problem I see with the luke interface is that its inside the /admin/ >> path, which to me means that my users shouldn't be able to access it. >> >> Whats the most SOLRy way to do this? >> >> Thanks! >> >> -D >
