All documents have been indexed with Solr 4.5.1.

Indeed in the process, some replicas died (replication error result of java 
heap memory errors) the recovery process never ended and I need to restart the 
node that store the replica in recovery mode.

The leader of the shard is the replica with less documents and the lower 
version.

Reproduce the issue could be tricky, I don't know happened :S, maybe a bad 
leader election process, a bad tlog writting operation.

-- 
Yago Riveiro
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)


On Monday, November 4, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:

> Hi - we've seen that issue as well (SOLR-4260) and it happend many times with 
> older versions. The good thing is that we haven't seen it for a very long 
> time now so i silently assumed other fixes already solved the problem.
> 
> We don't know how to reproduce the problem but in older versions it seemed to 
> happen when, while indexing, one of the replica's died (usually OOM). It 
> would be very helpful if you can reproduce the problem and follow up on the 
> issue with steps to reproduce.
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4260
> 
> -----Original message-----
> > From:yriveiro <yago.rive...@gmail.com (mailto:yago.rive...@gmail.com)>
> > Sent: Monday 4th November 2013 22:57
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org (mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org)
> > Subject: 2 replicas with different num of documents
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have 2 replicas with different number of documents, Is it possible?
> > 
> > I'm using Solr 4.5.1 
> > 
> > Replica 1:
> > 
> > version:77847
> > numDocs:5951879
> > maxDoc:5951978
> > deletedDocs:99
> > 
> > Replica 2:
> > 
> > version:76011
> > numDocs:5951793
> > maxDoc:5951965
> > deletedDocs:172
> > 
> > Is it not supposed tlog ensure the data consistency?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----
> > Best regards
> > --
> > View this message in context: 
> > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/2-replicas-with-different-num-of-documents-tp4099279.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com 
> > (http://Nabble.com).
> > 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to