Hi,
Please refer below link for clarification on fields having null value.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7332122/solr-what-are-the-default-values-for-fields-which-does-not-have-a-default-value
logically it is better to have different collections for different domain
data. Having 2 collections will improve the overall performances.
Currently am holding 2 collections for different domain data. It eases
importing data and re-indexing.
regards,
Shrikanth
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:48 PM, user 01 <user...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can some expert users please leave a comment on this ?
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 2:54 AM, user 01 <user...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Using a single node Solr instance, I need to search for, lets say,
> > electronics items & grocery items. But I never want to search both of
> them
> > together. When I search for electrnoics I don't expect a grocery item
> ever
> > & vice versa.
> >
> > Should I be defining both these document types within a single schema.xml
> > or should I use different collection for each of these two(maintaining
> > separate schema.xml & solrconfig.xml for each of two) ?
> >
> > I believe that if I add both to a single collection, without sharing
> > fields among these two document types, I should be equally good as
> > separating them in two collection(in terms of performance & all), as
> their
> > indexes/filter caches would be totally independent of each other when
> they
> > don't share fields?
> >
> >
> > Also posted at SO: http://stackoverflow.com/q/19202882/530153
> >
>
--
