On 09/03/2013 12:50 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: like to understand how the ordering is defined so that I can compute an
: integer that is sorted in the same way. For example (shard "id" << 24) |
: docid or something like that.
If you want to ensure a consistent ordering, you have to index a
(unique) value that you use as a secondary sort -- you can't trust the
internal docids will remain unchanged.
Thanks, Hoss - that was the conclusion that I was coming to. It's good
to have it confirmed.
-Mike
