p.s. see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5201
2013/8/29 Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> > Hi Jun, > > I agree the AE (instead of the AEProvider) should be cached on the > UpdateRequestProcessor. > In previous revisions [1] it was cached directly by the BasicAEProvider so > there wasn't need of that in the UIMAUpdateRequestProcessor but, since that > has changed, I agree that should be done there as well, I'll open an issue. > > Thanks, > Tommaso > > > [1] : > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/lucene/analysis/uima/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/uima/ae/BasicAEProvider.java?revision=1244236&view=markup > > > > 2013/8/29 Jun Ohtani <joht...@gmail.com> > >> Dear all, >> >> My co-worker use UIMA with Solr 4.4.0. >> But too slow UIMA with Solr. >> >> I read source code solr/contirb/uima/. >> Solr UIMA integration source code call repeatedly AEProvider.getAE(). >> Maybe it's create AnalysisEngine instance every request and every >> processText(). >> >> But Lucene code (o.a.l.analysis.uima.BaseUIMATokenizer) reuse >> AnalysisEngine instance. >> >> Why does Solr UIMA integration call AEProvider.getAE() every update >> request ? >> >> Regards, >> >> ------------ >> Jun Ohtani >> >> >> >> >
