No, ComplexPhraseQuery has been around for quite a while but never incorporated into the code base, it's pretty much what you need to do both fuzzy and phrase at once.
But, doesn't phonetic really incorporate at least a flavor of fuzzy? Is it close enough for your needs to just do phonetic matches? Best Erick On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Prasi S <prasi1...@gmail.com> wrote: > sry , i copied it wrong. Below is the correct analysis. > > Index time > > ST > trinity > services > SF > trinity > services > LCF > trinity > services > SF > trinity > services > SF > trinity > services > WDF > trinity > services > SF > triniti > servic > PF > TRNTtriniti > SRFKservic > HWF > TRNTtriniti > SRFKservic > PSF > TRNTtriniti > SRFKservic > > > > *Query time* > ST > trinity > services > SF > trinity > services > LCF > trinity > services > WDF > trinity > services > SF > triniti > servic > PSF > triniti > servic > PF > TRNTtriniti > SRFKservic > > Apart from this, fuzzy would be for indivual words and proximity would be > phrase. Is this correct. > also can we have fuzzy on phrases? > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Prasi S <prasi1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi Erick, > > Yes it is correct. These results are because of stemming + phonetic > > matching. Below is the > > > > Index time > > > > ST > > trinity > > services > > SF > > trinity > > services > > LCF > > trinity > > services > > SF > > trinity > > services > > SF > > trinity > > services > > WDF > > trinity > > services > > Query time > > > > SF > > triniti > > servic > > PF > > TRNT triniti > > SRFK servic > > HWF > > TRNT triniti > > SRFK servic > > PSF > > TRNT triniti > > SRFK servic > > Apart from this, fuzzy would be for indivual words and proximity would be > > phrase. Is this correct. > > also can we have fuzzy on phrases? > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> The first thing I'd recommend is to look at the admin/analysis > >> page. I suspect you aren't seeing fuzzy query results > >> at all, what you're seeing is the result of stemming. > >> > >> Stemming is algorithmic, so sometimes produces very > >> surprising results, i.e. Trinidad and Trinigee may stem > >> to something like triniti. > >> > >> But you didn't provide the field definition so it's just a guess. > >> > >> Best > >> Erick > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Prasi S <prasi1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > with solr 4.0 the fuzzy query syntax is like <keyword>~1 (or 2) > >> > Proximity search is like "value"~20. > >> > > >> > How does this differentiate between the two searches. My thought was > >> > promiximity would be on phrases and fuzzy on individual words. Is that > >> > correct? > >> > > >> > I wasnted to do a promiximity search for text field and gave the below > >> > query, > >> > > <ip>:<port>/collection1/select?q="trinity%20service"~50&debugQuery=yes, > >> > > >> > it gives me results as > >> > > >> > <result name="response" numFound="111" start="0" maxScore="4.1237307"> > >> > <doc> > >> > <str name="business_name">*Trinidad *Services</str> > >> > </doc> > >> > <doc> > >> > <str name="business_name">Trinity Services</str> > >> > </doc> > >> > <doc> > >> > <str name="business_name">Trinity Services</str> > >> > </doc> > >> > <doc> > >> > <str name="business_name">*Trinitee *Service</str> > >> > > >> > How to differentiate between fuzzy and proximity. > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Prasi > >> > > >> > > > > >
