From: "Steven Bower-2 [via Lucene]" <ml-node+s472066n4082569...@n3.nabble.com<mailto:ml-node+s472066n4082569...@n3.nabble.com>> Date: Monday, August 5, 2013 9:14 AM To: "Smiley, David W." <dsmi...@mitre.org<mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org>> Subject: Re: Performance question on Spatial Search
So after re-feeding our data with a new boolean field that is true when data exists and false when it doesn't our search times have gone from avg of about 20s to around 150ms... pretty amazing change in perf... It seems like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5093 might alleviate many peoples pain in doing this kind of query (if I have some time I may take a look at it).. Awesome performance improvement! Anyway we are in pretty good shape at this point.. the only remaining issue is that the first queries after commits are taking 5-6s... This is cause by the loading of 2 (one long and one int) FieldCaches (uninvert) that are used for sorting.. I'm suspecting that docvalues will greatly help this load performance? DocValues will help a lot. I'd love to see the before & after times on that conversion. I'm surprised it's taking as long as it is… but then you have a tone of data in one index so it's plausible. Lucene 4.4 has some compression improvements there: LUCENE-5035 ~ David ----- Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-question-on-Spatial-Search-tp4081150p4082588.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
