Nitin:

What was your tn_lookup_key_id field definition when things didn't work?
The stock lowercase is KeywordTokenizerFactory+LowerCaseFilterFactory
and if this leads to mis-matches as Hoss outlined, it'd surprise me so I need
to file it away in my list of things not to do.

Thanks,
Erick

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Nitin Agarwal <2nitinagar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoss, you rock!
>
> That was the issue, I changed tn_lookup_key_id, which was my unique key
> field, to string and reloaded the index and it works.
>
> Jason, Jack and Hoss, thanks for your help.
>
> Nitin
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Chris Hostetter
> <hossman_luc...@fucit.org>wrote:
>
>>
>> : Here is what my schema looks like
>>
>> what is your uniqueKey field?
>>
>> I'm going to bet it's "tn_lookup_key_id" and i'm going to bet your
>> "lowercase" fieldType has an interesting analyzer on it.
>>
>> you are probably hitting a situation where the analyzer you have on your
>> uniqueKey field is munging the values in such a way that when the
>> coordinator node decides which N docs to include in the response,
>> and then asks the various shards to give it those specific N
>> docs, those subsequent field fetching queries fail because of an
>> analysis mismatch.
>>
>> you need to keep your uniqueKeyField simple -- i strongly recommend a
>> basic StrField.  If you also want to do "lowercase" lookups on your key
>> field, index it redundently in a second field.
>>
>>
>> : *<fields>
>> :       <field name="_version_" type="long" indexed="true" stored="true"
>> : multiValued="false" />
>> :       <field name="bill_account_name" type="lowercase" indexed="true"
>> : stored="true" required="false" />
>> :       <field name="bill_account_nbr" type="lowercase" indexed="true"
>> : stored="true" required="false" />
>> :       <field name="cust_name" type="lowercase" indexed="true"
>> stored="true"
>> : required="false" />
>> :         **<field name="tn_lookup_key_id" type="lowercase"
>> : indexed="true" stored="true" required="true" />
>> : </fields>*
>>
>> -Hoss
>>

Reply via email to