Roman,

Let me briefly explain  the design

special RequestParser stores servlet output stream into the context
https://github.com/m-khl/solr-patches/compare/streaming#L7R22

then special component injects special PostFilter/DelegatingCollector which
writes right into output
https://github.com/m-khl/solr-patches/compare/streaming#L2R146

here is how it streams the doc, you see it's lazy enough
https://github.com/m-khl/solr-patches/compare/streaming#L2R181

I mention that it disables later collectors
https://github.com/m-khl/solr-patches/compare/streaming#L2R57
hence, no facets with streaming, yet as well as memory consumption.

This test shows how it works
https://github.com/m-khl/solr-patches/compare/streaming#L15R115

all other code purposed for distributed search.



On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Roman Chyla <roman.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Mikhail,
> If your solution gives lazy loading of solr docs /and thus streaming of
> huge result lists/ it should be big YES!
> Roman
> On 27 Jul 2013 07:55, "Mikhail Khludnev" <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Otis,
> > You gave links to 'deep paging' when I asked about response streaming.
> > Let me understand. From my POV, deep paging is a special case for regular
> > search scenarios. We definitely need it in Solr. However, if we are
> talking
> > about data analytic like problems, when we need to select an "endless"
> > stream of responses (or store them in file as Roman did), 'deep paging'
> is
> > a suboptimal hack.
> > What's your vision on this?
> >
>



-- 
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Principal Engineer,
Grid Dynamics

<http://www.griddynamics.com>
 <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>

Reply via email to