Hi Kowish, Here is an easy way to find out: 1 use copyField to copy from string to tlong 2 use ab or JMeter to hammer Solr while sorting on one or the other field (separate runs) 3 compare :)
Since you have SLAs, I'm assuming you already have 2 and 3 in place. Otis -- Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/ Performance Monitoring -- http://sematext.com/spm On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:42 AM, kowish.adamosh <kowish.adam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > What should be faster: sorting by field of type string (solr.StrField) or > long (solr.TrieLongField). > In both cases values are numbers so I can decide what type of field to use. > Is it possible to speed up sorting by unique field? With sorting my queries > are 10-100 times slower and I can't meet SLA with sorting ... > > Kowish > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-tp4075747.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
