I'm not familiar with block join in lucene. I've read a bit, and I just want
to make sure - do you think that when this ticket is released, it will solve
the current problem of solr cloud joins?

Also, can you elaborate a bit about your solution?


Jack Krupansky-2 wrote
> It sounds like 4.4 will have an RC next week, so the prospects for block 
> join in 4.4 are kind of dim. I mean, such a significant feature should
> have 
> more than a few days to bake before getting released. But... who knows
> what 
> Yonik has planned!
> 
> -- Jack Krupansky
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: adfel70
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 7:41 AM
> To: 

> solr-user@.apache

> Subject: Re: Converting nested data model to solr schema
> 
> As you see it, does SOLR-3076 fixes my problem?
> 
> Is SOLR-3076 fix getting into solr 4.4?
> 
> 
> Mikhail Khludnev wrote
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:56 PM, adfel70 <
> 
>> adfel70@
> 
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> This requires me to override the solr document distribution mechanism.
>>> I fear that with this solution I may loose some of solr cloud's
>>> capabilities.
>>>
>>
>> It's not clear whether you aware of
>> http://searchhub.org/2013/06/13/solr-cloud-document-routing/ , but what
>> you
>> did doesn't sound scary to me. If it works, it should be fine. I'm not
>> aware of any capabilities that you are going to loose.
>> Obviously SOLR-3076 provides astonishing query time performance, with
>> offloading actual join work into index time. Check it if you current
>> approach turns slow.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Sincerely yours
>> Mikhail Khludnev
>> Principal Engineer,
>> Grid Dynamics
>>
>> <http://www.griddynamics.com>
>>  <
> 
>> mkhludnev@
> 
>> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Converting-nested-data-model-to-solr-schema-tp4074351p4074668.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Converting-nested-data-model-to-solr-schema-tp4074351p4074696.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to