Well, now I'm really puzzled. The link you referenced was from when grouping/field collapsing was under development. I did a quick look through the entire 4x code base fo "collapse" and there's no place I saw that looks like it accepts that parameter. Of course I may have just missed it.
What version of Solr are you using? Have you done anything special to it? Can you cut/paste your response, or at least the relevant bits that show the effects of specifying collapse.field? Best Erick On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, slevytam <developm...@the10thfloor.com>wrote: > Hi Erick, > > I actually did mean collapse.field, as per: > > http://blog.trifork.com/2009/10/20/result-grouping-field-collapsing-with-solr/ > > On high level I am trying to avoid the use of a join between a list of > entries and a list of actions that users have performed on a entry (since > it's not supported by distributed search). > > So I have a list of entries > ie. entry_id, entry_content, etc > > And a list of actions users have performed on the entry > ie. entry_id, entry_read, entry_starred > > I'm trying to combine these for pagination purposes. By doing a search for > entry_id across the two cores (indexes) and then doing a collapse.field, I > am able to get this nice list of results. However, I cannot figure out a > way to then filter that list since q and fq happen before the collapse. > > Thanks, > > Shalom > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Field-Query-After-Collapse-Field-tp4073691p4073928.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
