On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote: > 2. Someone who expects partial update in a search engine, or transactions, > has a deep misunderstandings of the tradeoffs you make for what search can > do. That isn't mastery of arcane details, that is search 101.
Yes, they might (have misunderstanding). But between coming from SQL 'like' and hearing Solr being called NoSQL, you would not be surprised if that happened. I, for one, don't remember seeing a 'search 101' document that outlines those assumptions. And without it, how would one be expected to know those, except through some sort of mastery of _any_ search engine? And, if Solr is the _first_ such search engine, we just got ourselves back into catch-22 situation. So, I am with Jack on this one. Regards, Alex. Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
