Unix or Windows? And are the files still there after restarting Solr? Best Erick
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Pravin Bhutada <pravin.bhut...@gmail.com> wrote: > One thing that you can try is optimize incrementally. Instead of optimizing > to 1 segment, optimize to 100, then 50 , 25, 10 ,5 ,2 ,1 > After each step, the index size should go down. This way you dont have to > wait 7 hours to get some results. > > > Pravin > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Viresh Modi < > viresh.m...@highqsolutions.com> wrote: > >> Hi pravin >> >> I have nearly 2 TB Disk space for optimization.And after optimization get >> response of Qtime nearly 7hours (Obvious which in milisecond).So i think >> not issue of disk space. >> >> >> Thanks& Regards, >> Viresh modi >> Mobile: 91 (0) 9714567430 >> >> >> On 14 June 2013 20:10, Pravin Bhutada <pravin.bhut...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi Viresh, >> > >> > How much free disc space do you have? if you have dont have enough space >> > on disc, optimization process stops and rollsback to some intermediate >> > state. >> > >> > >> > Pravin >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Viresh Modi < >> > viresh.m...@highqsolutions.com >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Rafal >> > > >> > > Here i attached solr index file snapshot as well .. >> > > So can you look into this and any another information required >> regarding >> > > it then let me know. >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks& Regards, >> > > Viresh modi >> > > Mobile: 91 (0) 9714567430 >> > > >> > > >> > > On 13 June 2013 17:41, Rafał Kuć <r....@solr.pl> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hello! >> > >> >> > >> Do you have some backup after commit in your configuration? It would >> > >> also be good to see how your index directory looks like, can you list >> > >> that ? >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Regards, >> > >> Rafał Kuć >> > >> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - ElasticSearch >> > >> >> > >> > Thanks Rafal for reply... >> > >> >> > >> > I agree with you. But Actually After optimization , it does not >> reduce >> > >> size >> > >> > and it remains double. so is there any thing we missed or need to do >> > for >> > >> > achieving index size reduction ? >> > >> >> > >> > Is there any special setting we need to configure for replication? >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > On 13 June 2013 16:53, Rafał Kuć <r....@solr.pl> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> >> Hello! >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Optimize command needs to rewrite the segments, so while it is >> > >> >> still working you may see the index size to be doubled. However >> after >> > >> >> it is finished the index size will be usually lowered comparing to >> > the >> > >> >> index size before optimize. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> -- >> > >> >> Regards, >> > >> >> Rafał Kuć >> > >> >> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - ElasticSearch >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > Hi, >> > >> >> > I have solr server 1.4.1 with index file size 428GB.Now When I >> > >> upgrade >> > >> >> solr >> > >> >> > Server 1.4.1 to Solr 3.5.0 by replication method. Size remains >> > same. >> > >> >> > But when optimize index for Solr 3.5.0 instance its size reaches >> > >> 791GB.so >> > >> >> > what is solutions for size remains same or lesser. >> > >> >> > I optimize Solr 3.5 with Query: >> > >> >> > <solr3.5 url>/update?optimize=true&commit=true >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > Thanks & regards >> > >> >> > Viresh Modi >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > ------------------------------ >> > > This email and its attachments are intended for the above named only >> and >> > > may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no >> > > action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please >> > > reply to this email and highlight the error. >> > > >> > >> >> -- >> >> ------------------------------ >> This email and its attachments are intended for the above named only and >> may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no >> action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please >> reply to this email and highlight the error. >>
