Hi Otis,

Sorry, it does not formatted. 

Time    queryTime(ms),  CPU %   r/s       w/s   rMB/s   wMB/s   IO %
...
7:30:24 12      89      156.44  0       16.4    0       94.06
7:30:25 18      91      157     0       15.35   0       98.1
7:30:26 9       91      194     0       19.62   0       96.1
7:30:27 14      38      352     0       38.17   0       100.1
7:30:28 30      77      205.94  16.83   20.17   4.02    98.51
7:30:30 101     88      396     0       45.99   0       90.7
7:30:31 11      90      120     0       11.34   0       97.5
7:30:32 38      89      262.38  0       28.03   0       96.24
7:30:33 11      78      68      17      4.89    4.93    99.9
7:30:34 9       29      201     0       20.16   0       100.3
7:30:35 9       87      181     0       17.27   0       94.3
7:30:52 16594   26      36      0       0.14    0       99.3    !!!!
7:30:53 31      80      368     0       42.43   0       94.3
7:31:23 28575   41      35      21      0.37    2.36    95.9   !!!!
7:31:27 2676    60      127     0       13.76   0       83.5
7:31:28 8       59      279     0       30.99   0       99.4
7:32:22 53399   31      81      39      0.74    2.63    99.5    !!!!!!!
7:32:23 11      54      155     0       16.46   0       99.6
7:32:24 9       47      63.37   4.95    4.18    0.02    98.42
7:32:25 9       25      34      0       0.13    0       98.8
7:32:26 8       27      30      0       0.12    0       99.9
7:33:28 60199   28      30      2       0.12    0.01    99.8    !!!!!!


But why it always query slow at the last few minutes. I have tested it many 
times the optimize will last for 2 hours , almost every time, the query is 
quick enough(query cost about 30ms) in the 2 hours, only slow at the last few 
minutes(query will cost 60000ms). 

Thanks,
Jeffery
-----Original Message-----
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 2013年6月14日 12:20
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 Optimize query very slow before the optimize end of a few 
minutes

Hi,

What you pasted from console didn't come across well.  Yes, optimizing a static 
index is OK and yes, if your index is "very unoptimized" then yes, it will be 
slower than when it is optimized.... not sure if that addresses your concerns...

Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/





On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Jeffery Wang <jeffery.w...@morningstar.com> 
wrote:
> Do someone known Why the query is very slow before the optimize end of a few 
> minutes.
>
> When the solr optimize, I have a loop query( curl "query url" and sleep one 
> second) every one second to check the query speed. It is normal, the query 
> time can be accept. But it always very slow before the optimize end of a few 
> minutes.
> The solr index size is about 22G after optimized.
>
> The follows is the query time cost, CPU and IO usage. The whole optimize 
> process, the IO is high, it can be understand.
> time
>
> query time(ms)
>
> CPU %
>
> r/s
>
>   w/s
>
> rMB/s
>
> wMB/s
>
> IO %
>
> 7:30:24
>
> 12
>
> 89
>
> 156.44
>
> 0
>
> 16.4
>
> 0
>
> 94.06
>
> 7:30:25
>
> 18
>
> 91
>
> 157
>
> 0
>
> 15.35
>
> 0
>
> 98.1
>
> 7:30:26
>
> 9
>
> 91
>
> 194
>
> 0
>
> 19.62
>
> 0
>
> 96.1
>
> 7:30:27
>
> 14
>
> 38
>
> 352
>
> 0
>
> 38.17
>
> 0
>
> 100.1
>
> 7:30:28
>
> 30
>
> 77
>
> 205.94
>
> 16.83
>
> 20.17
>
> 4.02
>
> 98.51
>
> 7:30:30
>
> 101
>
> 88
>
> 396
>
> 0
>
> 45.99
>
> 0
>
> 90.7
>
> 7:30:31
>
> 11
>
> 90
>
> 120
>
> 0
>
> 11.34
>
> 0
>
> 97.5
>
> 7:30:32
>
> 38
>
> 89
>
> 262.38
>
> 0
>
> 28.03
>
> 0
>
> 96.24
>
> 7:30:33
>
> 11
>
> 78
>
> 68
>
> 17
>
> 4.89
>
> 4.93
>
> 99.9
>
> 7:30:34
>
> 9
>
> 29
>
> 201
>
> 0
>
> 20.16
>
> 0
>
> 100.3
>
> 7:30:35
>
> 9
>
> 87
>
> 181
>
> 0
>
> 17.27
>
> 0
>
> 94.3
>
> 7:30:52
>
> 16594
>
> 26
>
> 36
>
> 0
>
> 0.14
>
> 0
>
> 99.3
>
> 7:30:53
>
> 31
>
> 80
>
> 368
>
> 0
>
> 42.43
>
> 0
>
> 94.3
>
> 7:31:23
>
> 28575
>
> 41
>
> 35
>
> 21
>
> 0.37
>
> 2.36
>
> 95.9
>
> 7:31:27
>
> 2676
>
> 60
>
> 127
>
> 0
>
> 13.76
>
> 0
>
> 83.5
>
> 7:31:28
>
> 8
>
> 59
>
> 279
>
> 0
>
> 30.99
>
> 0
>
> 99.4
>
> 7:32:22
>
> 53399
>
> 31
>
> 81
>
> 39
>
> 0.74
>
> 2.63
>
> 99.5
>
> 7:32:23
>
> 11
>
> 54
>
> 155
>
> 0
>
> 16.46
>
> 0
>
> 99.6
>
> 7:32:24
>
> 9
>
> 47
>
> 63.37
>
> 4.95
>
> 4.18
>
> 0.02
>
> 98.42
>
> 7:32:25
>
> 9
>
> 25
>
> 34
>
> 0
>
> 0.13
>
> 0
>
> 98.8
>
> 7:32:26
>
> 8
>
> 27
>
> 30
>
> 0
>
> 0.12
>
> 0
>
> 99.9
>
> 7:33:28
>
> 60199
>
> 28
>
> 30
>
> 2
>
> 0.12
>
> 0.01
>
> 99.8
>
>
> Thanks,
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ____________________
> Jeffery Wang

Reply via email to