We are currently using version 4.2.
We have made tests with a single document and it gives us a 2 document
count. But if we force to shard into te first machine, the one with a
unique shard, the count gives us 1 document.
I've tried using distrib=false parameter, it gives us no duplicate
documents, but the same document appears to be in two different shards.
Finally, about the separate directories, We have only one directory for the
data in each physical machine and collection, and I don't see any subfolder
for the different shards.
Is it possible that we have something wrong with the dataDir configuration
to use multiple shards in one machine?
<dataDir>${solr.data.dir:}</dataDir>
<directoryFactory name="DirectoryFactory"
class="${solr.directoryFactory:solr.NRTCachingDirectoryFactory}"/>
2013/5/3 Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
> What version of Solr? The custom routing stuff is quite new so
> I'm guessing 4x?
>
> But this shouldn't be happening. The actual index data for the
> shards should be in separate directories, they just happen to
> be on the same physical machine.
>
> Try querying each one with &distrib=false to see the counts
> from single shards, that may shed some light on this. It vaguely
> sounds like you have indexed the same document to both shards
> somehow...
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Iker Mtnz. Apellaniz
> <mitxin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We have currently a solrCloud implementation running 5 shards in 3
> > physical machines, so the first machine will have the shard number 1, the
> > second machine shards 2 & 4, and the third shards 3 & 5. We noticed that
> > while queryng numFoundDocs decreased when we increased the start param.
> > After some investigation we found that the documents in shards 2 to 5
> > were being counted twice. Querying to shard 2 will give you back the
> > results for shard 2 & 4, and the same thing for shards 3 & 5. Our guess
> is
> > that the physical index for both shard 2&4 is shared, so the shards don't
> > know which part of it is for each one.
> > The uniqueKey is correctly defined, and we have tried using shard
> prefix
> > (shard1!docID).
> >
> > Is there any way to solve this problem when a unique physical machine
> > shares shards?
> > Is it a "real" problem os it just affects facet & numResults?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Iker
> >
> > --
> > /** @author imartinez*/
> > Person me = *new* Developer();
> > me.setName(*"Iker Mtz de Apellaniz Anzuola"*);
> > me.setTwit("@mitxino77 <https://twitter.com/mitxino77>");
> > me.setLocations({"St Cugat, Barcelona", "Kanpezu, Euskadi", "*,
> World"]});
> > me.setSkills({*SoftwareDeveloper, Curious, AmateurCook*});
> > me.setWebs({*urbasaabentura.com, ikertxef.com*});
> > *return* me;
>
--
/** @author imartinez*/
Person me = *new* Developer();
me.setName(*"Iker Mtz de Apellaniz Anzuola"*);
me.setTwit("@mitxino77 <https://twitter.com/mitxino77>");
me.setLocations({"St Cugat, Barcelona", "Kanpezu, Euskadi", "*, World"]});
me.setSkills({*SoftwareDeveloper, Curious, AmateurCook*});
*return* me;
